This is a cool idea. Just change the parameters of the //e drone to something that does not fly. I suspect that controlling 3-d motion using LOGO would be rather difficult and servicing interrupts in the //e could be a challenge, but using LOGO on a //e is a great idea - even if it was done tongue in cheek. Jim -----Original Message----- From: vcf-midatlantic [mailto:vcf-midatlantic-bounces@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org] On Behalf Of Evan Koblentz via vcf-midatlantic Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 9:12 PM To: vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> Cc: Evan Koblentz <evan@snarc.net> Subject: Re: [vcf-midatlantic] Mad science experiment
As I understand it, to maintain control of a typical quadcopter, the flight controller adjusts the speed of each rotor several hundred times a second, based on feedback from various sensors - this may (!) be beyond the Apple //e. Besides, the quad couldn't carry it!
I wasn't all that serious. Just wanted to see, on a whim last night, if I could make it lift off. Didn't happen. There are places where I could remove a part or two for weight savings, and I could gear up the motor for more power, but it's not worth the effort... for now. :)