As long as we're talking about Simpson 260 multimeters ... I have a Simpson 262 Series E that suffered battery-failure (x2) in its former life. I'd like to put it back into service (for the reasons that Dave states, below), and aside from fixing the corrosion at the battery contacts (pointers anyone?) I've been "put off" by the problem of finding affordable modern substitutes for the pair of 15v batteries used in the higher resistance ranges. Any suggestions for a suitable substitute for the 30v (total) battery requirement? -----Original Message----- From: vcf-midatlantic [mailto:vcf-midatlantic-bounces@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org] On Behalf Of David Riley via vcf-midatlantic Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 10:46 AM To: vcf-midatlantic Cc: David Riley Subject: Re: [vcf-midatlantic] Apple IIe Voltmeter On Nov 13, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Herb Johnson via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
I prefer analog meters when making "runs" of comparative measurements.
It's easy to see if one reading is "more" or "less" than another, the needle is literally in different positions. I prefer them for that and, for diagnosing intermediate or "wandering" problems (or quickly checking continuity), it's MUCH easier to see a needle moving than wait for the update of an LCD.
I've found variations in current measurements among several Simpson 260 meters (and among their scales) I've acquired. My guess is that some of the shunts were "cooked" by excessive current, or corroded by time and tide. I have not yet gone to the trouble of diagnosing them, I simply use the meters that have the best readings through the procedures noted. They are cheap today.
I've definitely cooked current shunts in both digital and analog meters. Nothing is immune, even the fused ones (those fuses do have a finite blow time, which is more than enough to damage something if you accidentally touch mains).
Why? Given the "digital is better" bias these days, only a few people call out the Simpson 260 as a valued instrument - Dave McGuire for instance, in that email list we used to use.
Digital is marginally better in situations where you need to record a number, but that's really just laziness. They can actually be more precise where that matters, but it seldom does. And I like the autoranging of digital meters, but that goes back to laziness. I have a very nice Fluke 87-V that I use for just about everything, but there are a lot of times I wish I had a dependable and portable analog meter as a counterpart. - Dave