8 Nov
2015
8 Nov
'15
7:41 p.m.
On 11/08/2015 07:39 PM, Evan Koblentz via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
Those who argue the 1802 "was a loser so forgetit" might explain why a computing museum should show only "the winners", and set a dollar or production count for "winning".
I agree 100%. Is anyone really stupid enough to say something like that about any chip, processor or otherwise, in constant production for 39 years (1976-present) with no plans for discontinuance?
Nobody said anything like that.
Of course not, and I made no such claim, nor did Herb. If anyone does in the future, though, feel free to refer them to me so I can beat them over the head with the numbers. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA