This is becoming an argument. That's understandable, but that's not my goal. My point of throwing the "old guy" card, is to say some interest in vintage computing is persistent, is beyond keeping one's computer running, but in goals you refer to as "museum". Most museums put a computer on a shelf, don't touch: the work I describe re-engages people with now-working computers. Your work also engages others; I don't question the value of art, or oblige it to be for purpose. This is what engagement looks like. You assert the permanence of your art, versus eventual drive failure. Certainly, all things come to an end; I don't give up, neither do you. As I said: we have some common interests, we compete for some resources. That's fine, we are adults, we can work in concert and good will to further mutual ends. You accommodate restoration interests, as do the recyclers. That's good. (You might tell me, where on eBay you sell electronics, I need a CMI 5619 5.25-inch drive for electronics.) I'll remind you: this is a vintage computing forum. I asserted that point of view in response to your post about your art. You've given mostly reasonable responses, thank you. Other people can review our discussion, see work done, make their own considerations. Those were my goals. Thank you. - Herb On 4/16/2019 11:35 AM, Brian Brubaker wrote:
"not all of those whole-drives go to the landfill or become recycled" I would argue that you may have a limited view as well, and while I may not have a complete picture of what vintage hard drives are currently used for, I believe my point is still valid....
-- Herbert R. Johnson, New Jersey in the USA http://www.retrotechnology.com OR .net preserve, recover, restore 1970's computing email: hjohnson AT retrotechnology DOT com or try later herbjohnson AT retrotechnology DOT info