https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/does-anyone-have-a-working-8-inch-...
So, funny thing happened to me, in the VCFed forum, where there was that discussion of IBM 5510 8-inch floppy drive/disk business, also discussed here. I laid out my usual considerations about making old IMD disk images onto floppy disks. Writing in my usual way, pretty much. People here, know what to expect from me. But in that forum, more than one person wondered "is this an AI chatbot response?" When I suggested otherwise (!), the person apologized and explained their reasoning. In another discussion, they wrote, someone recently gave them a somewhat formal and neutral-tone response. Apparently, their respondent used some AI-generated content as part of their post. So I said, in so many words, I'm old and technically trained. Maybe, I sound like the old-school content that was trained into that AI 'bot? Makes some kind of sense. While I was initially annoyed, our exchange made me thoughtful. Is this gonna be a thing now? Is some informed-sort of response, now gonna be judged as maybe being AI-generated, and therefore suspect of what some call "hallucinations" (and others call nonfactual, fantasies, or lies)? If generative AI becomes the standard, and real humans don't meet that standard, will people be held at fault? Or worse, leave correspondence entirely to the 'bots? That's my general fear, for any new technology of convenience. That is, degrading some skill that used to require human activity. Here in vintage computing, we (should) know something about that history. Is this an AI response too? Most sources, would say it is not. If I desire, can you provide me with character references (Spock)? regards, Her"bot" Johnson -- Herbert R. Johnson, New Jersey USA https://www.retrotechnology.com OR .net preserve, recover, restore 1970's computing email: hjohnson AT retrotechnology DOT com or try later herbjohnson AT comcast DOT net