On Jan 10, 2018, at 05:22, corey cohen via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
So I’m trying to understand which is better, forgetting you can quickly remove a CF Card vs the IDE DOM.
I’m just about done with my Lisa 2/10 and am using an XProfile drive replacement for the widget drive. With the way the XProfile is mounted both an IDE DOM and CF Card are easy to swap in and out but I’m worried that in the long run LisaOS does a lot of writing of state to the disk. For the occasional MacWorks use to run Macintosh software on the Lisa, I will use a CF Card.
Does one have a different read/write duty cycle so it will last longer? Or are they really these days just the same thing in a different package/interface?
You can find "industrial" CF cards that are meant for disk use. They're often SLC, so they cost more, but their durability and retention is way better than MLC. Other than that, it's luck of the draw; I'm sure there are plenty of crappy DOMs that are just as bad as bad photo CF cards. The general issue will be reliability, which depends on the type of cell (SLC vs MLC) and the wear leveling algorithm. If you want to make it last longest, just try not to churn on it too much. When I put a Unix system on CF for embedded machines or routers, I typically mount everything read-only and mount /var and anything else that gets constant reads as a RAM disk, then sync contents to persistent storage every hour or so. My home router has been running on a 4 GB CF card like that for many years, and the last one ran on a 64 MB one for close to a decade. - Dave