I support a Digital Archive and we just bought http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Pro/SeriesStylusPro4900/Overview.do?U... We spent $2K but it produces unbelievable high-quality images. The only reason I mention it is because the quality of the output is surprised me. May not be worth it for the museum. Ben

On Jan 4, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Evan Koblentz via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:

I meant 17x22, not 11x22.

Evan, I've bought a couple of Epson Workforce multifunction devices which have a scanner glass 11x17, and can print larger than 11x17 as well. They are inkjet, and the WF7610 and one WF7620 have worked well; there is a WF7110 printer only 13x19 inkjet as well, but I have no experience with that one. (at $149 it is reasonably priced, but ink isn't cheap) http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/ProductCategory.do?oid=-17867&sortid=... I From: Evan Koblentz via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> To: vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> Cc: Evan Koblentz <evan@snarc.net> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 9:04 AM Subject: Re: [vcf-midatlantic] Correction: Semi-OT: printer for new museum signs

...

We spent $2K

That's where I stopped reading. :) But I just learned that even very cheap inkjets, sub-$200, can print 11x17. That might be our best compromise if a larger printer is unaffordable.