Semi-OT: Need help with adding NE2000 patch to DOSBox SVN
I'm attempting to build a version of DOSBox with NE2000 emulation support. I'm trying to build it on the Raspberry Pi 3. I'm able to successfully compile the current SVN of vanilla DOSBox on my Pi. But I don't know how to add the patch in. There are several releases out there for Windows, but always have other additional patches/features which are not needed for my project. And I'm not able to get them to build on my Pi. This is for the BBS project I'm working on. If someone could assist, I would greatly appreciate the help. Thanks, Joe -- Normal Person: Hey, it seems that you know a lot. Geek: To be honest, it's due to all the surfing I do. Normal Person: So you go surfing? Normal Person: But I don't think that has anything to do with knowing a lot... Geek: I think that's wrong on a fundamental level. Normal Person: Huh? Huh? What?
How about using FreeDOS on bare metal? It has TCP/IP support. On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:09 PM Joseph Oprysko via vcf-midatlantic < vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
I'm attempting to build a version of DOSBox with NE2000 emulation support.
I'm trying to build it on the Raspberry Pi 3. I'm able to successfully
compile the current SVN of vanilla DOSBox on my Pi. But I don't know how to
add the patch in.
There are several releases out there for Windows, but always have other
additional patches/features which are not needed for my project. And I'm
not able to get them to build on my Pi.
This is for the BBS project I'm working on.
If someone could assist, I would greatly appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Joe
--
Normal Person: Hey, it seems that you know a lot.
Geek: To be honest, it's due to all the surfing I do.
Normal Person: So you go surfing?
Normal Person: But I don't think that has anything to do with knowing a
lot...
Geek: I think that's wrong on a fundamental level.
Normal Person: Huh? Huh? What?
On 12/30/2016 01:11 PM, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
How about using FreeDOS on bare metal? It has TCP/IP support.
I think FreeDOS only runs on x86. -- Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry@linuxha.com http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies
Dues it have to be RPi? Not knocking it (I love them), but I'm wondering if all the layers of abstraction complicates things unnecessarily. On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM Neil Cherry <ncherry@linuxha.com> wrote:
On 12/30/2016 01:11 PM, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
How about using FreeDOS on bare metal? It has TCP/IP support.
I think FreeDOS only runs on x86.
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry@linuxha.com
http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog
Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies
Well, yes and no. For the "official" project, no it does not have to be. For my own personal satisfaction, yes. I'm stubborn and do have the BBS 'functional' on the RPi, but the official build doesn't emulate an actual network card, so the packet driver doesn't work. So I want to make it happen, if I learn something in the process, even better. On Friday, December 30, 2016, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic < vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
Dues it have to be RPi? Not knocking it (I love them), but I'm wondering if all the layers of abstraction complicates things unnecessarily.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM Neil Cherry <ncherry@linuxha.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
On 12/30/2016 01:11 PM, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
How about using FreeDOS on bare metal? It has TCP/IP support.
I think FreeDOS only runs on x86.
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry@linuxha.com <javascript:;>
http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog
Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies
-- Normal Person: Hey, it seems that you know a lot. Geek: To be honest, it's due to all the surfing I do. Normal Person: So you go surfing? Normal Person: But I don't think that has anything to do with knowing a lot... Geek: I think that's wrong on a fundamental level. Normal Person: Huh? Huh? What?
Sounds like quite the challenge. Let know what you find out! On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:37 PM Joseph Oprysko via vcf-midatlantic < vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
Well, yes and no. For the "official" project, no it does not have to be.
For my own personal satisfaction, yes. I'm stubborn and do have the BBS
'functional' on the RPi, but the official build doesn't emulate an actual
network card, so the packet driver doesn't work. So I want to make it
happen, if I learn something in the process, even better.
On Friday, December 30, 2016, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic <
vcf-midatlantic@lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
Dues it have to be RPi? Not knocking it (I love them), but I'm wondering if
all the layers of abstraction complicates things unnecessarily.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM Neil Cherry <ncherry@linuxha.com
<javascript:;>> wrote:
On 12/30/2016 01:11 PM, Dean Notarnicola via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
How about using FreeDOS on bare metal? It has TCP/IP support.
I think FreeDOS only runs on x86.
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry@linuxha.com
<javascript:;>
http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog
Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies
--
Normal Person: Hey, it seems that you know a lot.
Geek: To be honest, it's due to all the surfing I do.
Normal Person: So you go surfing?
Normal Person: But I don't think that has anything to do with knowing a
lot...
Geek: I think that's wrong on a fundamental level.
Normal Person: Huh? Huh? What?
participants (3)
-
Dean Notarnicola -
Joseph Oprysko -
Neil Cherry