[vcf-midatlantic] Can you see me?
David Ryskalczyk
david.rysk at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 15:07:51 EST 2015
Looking at the raw email, I'm seeing this:
Authentication-Results: www.mailmanlists.us;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=wGfCvLcK;
dkim-atps=neutral
I wonder if this is related. I'm not sure there's a good solution for this issue, but DKIM is why Yahoo often has problems with mailing lists.
David
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Chris Fala via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
>
> It is whitelisted.
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Mike Loewen via vcf-midatlantic <
> vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Chris Fala via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
>>
>> FYI, this was in my spam folder.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Herb Johnson via vcf-midatlantic <
>>> vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I'm a little concerned about the complaints about messages ending up in
>> someone's SPAM folder. Isn't this an end user issue? I would think it's
>> the end user's responsibility to ensure that mailing lists or users are
>> whitelisted. The mailing list doesn't make SPAM judgements; it's the email
>> client on the other end, or sometimes the ISP's SMTP server. If it's the
>> ISP SMTP server doing the SPAM rating, don't they leave the decision to the
>> end user of what to do with it? At our university, the SMTP server
>> attaches X-???-Spam-Hits and X-???-Spam-Flag headers, but it's up to the
>> user whether they want to use them or not.
>>
>>
>> Mike Loewen mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
>> Old Technology http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
>>
More information about the vcf-midatlantic
mailing list