[vcf-midatlantic] Can you see me?

David Ryskalczyk david.rysk at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 15:07:51 EST 2015


Looking at the raw email, I'm seeing this:

Authentication-Results: www.mailmanlists.us;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=wGfCvLcK;
	dkim-atps=neutral


I wonder if this is related. I'm not sure there's a good solution for this issue, but DKIM is why Yahoo often has problems with mailing lists.

David

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Chris Fala via vcf-midatlantic <vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
> 
> It is whitelisted.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Mike Loewen via vcf-midatlantic <
> vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Chris Fala via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
>> 
>> FYI, this was in my spam folder.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Herb Johnson via vcf-midatlantic <
>>> vcf-midatlantic at lists.vintagecomputerfederation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>>   I'm a little concerned about the complaints about messages ending up in
>> someone's SPAM folder.  Isn't this an end user issue?  I would think it's
>> the end user's responsibility to ensure that mailing lists or users are
>> whitelisted.  The mailing list doesn't make SPAM judgements; it's the email
>> client on the other end, or sometimes the ISP's SMTP server.  If it's the
>> ISP SMTP server doing the SPAM rating, don't they leave the decision to the
>> end user of what to do with it?  At our university, the SMTP server
>> attaches X-???-Spam-Hits and X-???-Spam-Flag headers, but it's up to the
>> user whether they want to use them or not.
>> 
>> 
>> Mike Loewen                             mloewen at cpumagic.scol.pa.us
>> Old Technology                          http://q7.neurotica.com/Oldtech/
>> 




More information about the vcf-midatlantic mailing list