[vcf-midatlantic] Signed Apple ][
mcguire at neurotica.com
Wed Jun 15 13:11:13 EDT 2016
There's definitely something funny going on, yes.
On 06/15/2016 01:09 PM, Alan Hightower via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
> Not contesting the rule, but it seems odd. The $4K value is a reflection
> of the next highest bidders high bid. The bid that was retracted was for
> an amount just over or substantially over $4K. With it retracted, don't
> we now know what the second highest bidder's maximum bid currently is /
> always has been (eg $4K)? This seems a bit unfair to the new high bidder
> (previously second). The current $1340 price is actually determined by
> the next-next highest bidder (3rd in line over all) and not the current
> high bid holder.
> It's an odd (and seemingly unfair) rule.
> On 2016-06-15 11:35, Dave McGuire via vcf-midatlantic wrote:
>> Sellers do not have to approve bid retractions.
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
More information about the vcf-midatlantic