[vcf-midatlantic] Bag-o-chips sorting, storing, testing
Herb Johnson
hjohnson at retrotechnology.info
Wed Apr 21 19:32:29 UTC 2021
> The TL866 device does fault checking rather quickly. No need to guess with
> in-circuit testing.
Well, I don't "guess". I use, as I said, an oscilloscope if I have any
doubts. I have the skills to consider, if a logic level is changing as
it ought to; or if the signal suggests there's a pullup or pulldown
problem. Likewise on outputs, if I get no change when I should get some
changes. And: I can read the circuit logic if necessary, and determine
what needs to be seen. This is what we old-people techs did in the era,
with circuits of the era. It's still a useful vintage repair skill.
I don't trust a microcontroller, as in a TL866 device, to do much beyond
some simple, slow logic-testing. It's go/nogo to be sure. And for quote
"ten seconds work" on a $30 tester, I would not expect more.
But I'm not gonna test a box of loose chips, like some pick-and-place
robot. I have all the 74LS00 chips I will ever need, without testing
pulled ones. Their functions are easily determined, and they are very
cheap.
I considered not posting the above. After all, it's about one set of
skills versus another set of skills. People do what they are able to do,
with tools they have.
But I posted, so those who use TL866 class testers can tell me "these
are great, they do X Y and Z, really found subtle problems" and so on.
Or not. I'd appreciate hearing about actual results. and: I don't hear
much posting about "oscilloscopes" - they are surely out of common
practice, but they are really useful in my opinion, and should be
discussed in the matter of logic-chip-level vintage repairs.
One other thing.
These chips aren't going into any "parts bins" of unused chips, as
suggested. Martin said "...into the VCF box ... long term storage". So
no confusion, because they aren't "confused" with new chips anyway.
That's a prudent decision, in my opinion. In my shop, old used parts and
new parts are kept separate, for reasons already discussed.
Also: I haven't seen any accounting of the parts themselves. This may be
a lot of fuss, over little.
I'll be curious to hear, what is actually found among these chips, what
is usefully scarce versus all-too-common. A list in the "VCF box", keeps
people from digging through just to find nothing desired. And now that I
invested some interest in the matter, I'd like to see what came of it.
Regards, Herb Johnson
--
Herbert R. Johnson, New Jersey in the USA
http://www.retrotechnology.com OR .net
preserve, recover, restore 1970's computing
email: hjohnson AT retrotechnology DOT com
or try later herbjohnson AT comcast DOT net
More information about the vcf-midatlantic
mailing list